Forsaken Saga Viki - Kullanıcı katkıları [tr]

National ID Card A Disaster In The Making

2026-05-25T04:39:52Z

TameraMarcantel: "id="article-body" class="row" section="article-body"> Six years into the "new normal" of terror alerts, identification checks, electronic surveillance, and increasing levels of secrecy-based security, the prospect of a national identification card needs serious public debate. In March, the Department of Homeland Security released its long-awaited guidance document regarding national implementation of the Real ID program, as part of its post-9/11 national..." içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu

id="article-body" class="row" section="article-body"> Six years into the "new normal" of terror alerts, identification checks, electronic surveillance, and increasing levels of secrecy-based security, the prospect of a national identification card needs serious public debate. In March, the Department of Homeland Security released its long-awaited guidance document regarding national implementation of the Real ID program, as part of its post-9/11 national security initiatives. It is perhaps quite telling that despite bipartisan opposition, Real ID was buried in a 2005 "must-pass" military spending bill and enacted into law without public debate or congressional hearings. DHS has maintained that the Real ID concept is not a national identification database. While it's true that the system is not a single database per se, this is a semantic dodge; according to the DHS document, Real ID will be a collaborative data-interchange environment built from a series of interlinking systems operated and administered by the states. In other words, to the Department of Homeland Security, it's not a single database because it's not a single system. But the functionality of a single database remains intact under the guise of a federated data-interchange environment. The DHS document notes the "primary benefit of Real ID is to improve the security and lessen the vulnerability of federal buildings, nuclear facilities, and aircraft to terrorist attack." We know now that vulnerable cockpit doors were the primary security weakness contributing to 9/11, and reinforcing them was a long-overdue protective measure to prevent hijackings. But this still raises an interesting question: Are there really so many members of the American public just "dropping by" to visit a nuclear facility that it's become a primary reason for creating a national identification system? Are such visitors actually admitted? They will become stigmatized, branded, marked, ostracized, segregated. DHS proposes guidelines for proving one's identity and residence when applying for a Real ID card. Yet while the department concedes it's a monumental task to prove one's domicile or [https://wijayaabadibesi.com/ jual besi siku semarang] residence, it leaves it up to the states to determine what documents would be adequate proof of residence--and even suggests that a utility bill or bank statement might be appropriate documentation. If so, a person could easily generate multiple proof-of-residence documents. Basing Real ID on such easy-to-forge documents obviates a large portion of what Real ID is supposed to accomplish. Finally, and perhaps most importantly for Americans, the very last paragraph of the 160-page Real ID document deserves special attention. In a nod to states' rights advocates, DHS declares that states are free not to participate in the Real ID system if they choose--but any identification card issued by a state that does not meet Real ID criteria is to be clearly labeled as such, to include "bold lettering" or a "unique design" similar to how many states design driver's licenses for those under 21 years of age. In its own guidance document, the department has proposed branding citizens not possessing a Real ID card in a manner that lets all who see their official state-issued identification know that they're "different," and perhaps potentially dangerous, according to standards established by the federal government. They would become stigmatized, branded, marked, ostracized, segregated. All in the name of protecting the homeland; no wonder this provision appears at the very end of the document. One likely outcome of this DHS-proposed social segregation is that people presenting non-Real ID identification automatically will be presumed suspicious and perhaps subject to additional screening or surveillance to confirm their innocence at a bar, office building, airport or routine traffic stop. Such a situation would establish a new form of social segregation--an attempt to separate "us" from "them" in the age of counterterrorism and the new normal, where one is presumed suspicious until proven more suspicious. It's time to rethink some of the security decisions made during the emotional aftermath of 9/11. Two other big-picture concerns about Real ID come to mind: Looking at the overall concept of a national identification database, and given existing [https://www.accountingweb.co.uk/search?search_api_views_fulltext=data%20security data security] controls in large distributed systems, one wonders how vulnerable this [https://mondediplo.com/spip.php?page=recherche&recherche=system-of-systems system-of-systems] will be to data loss or identity theft resulting from unscrupulous employees, flawed technologies, external compromises or human error--even under the best of security conditions. And second, there is no clear guidance on the limits of how the Real ID database would be used. Other homeland security initiatives, such as the Patriot Act, have been used and applied--some say abused--for purposes far removed from anything related to homeland security. How can we ensure the same will not happen with Real ID? As currently proposed, Real ID will fail for several reasons. From a technical and implementation perspective, there are serious questions about its operational abilities both to protect citizen information and resist attempts at circumvention by adversaries. Financially, the initial unfunded $11 billion cost, forced onto the states by the federal government, is excessive. And from a sociological perspective, Real ID will increase the potential for expanded personal surveillance and lay the foundation for a new form of class segregation in the name of protecting the homeland. It's time to rethink some of the security decisions made during the emotional aftermath of 9/11 and determine whether they're still a good idea for homeland security and America. After all, if Real ID was such a well-conceived plan, Maine and 22 other states wouldn't be challenging it in their legislatures or rejecting the Real ID concept for any number of reasons. But they are. And we as citizens should, too. Let the debate begin. Comments Notification on Notification off Tech Industry

Non Destructive Testing Of Building Concrete Structure

2026-05-24T10:38:10Z

TameraMarcantel: "Non-destructive tests have accomplished a key role within the quality control of hardened concrete and the assessment of the current concrete framework about its intensity & durability over a brief period of 10 years after the earthquake in Bhuj. The hardened concrete framework is sometimes essential to assess its suitability for use. However, the examination of current or fresh constructions should not be affected by the method. The non-destructive tech..." içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu

Non-destructive tests have accomplished a key role within the quality control of hardened concrete and the assessment of the current concrete framework about its intensity & durability over a brief period of 10 years after the earthquake in Bhuj. The hardened concrete framework is sometimes essential to assess its suitability for use. However, the examination of current or fresh constructions should not be affected by the method. The non-destructive techniques of screening for concrete constructions are used in such situations. Various NDT studies for compressive strength of concrete are accessible but are chosen depending on their suitability and implementation. These experiments can be entirely non-destroying or partly damaging exams, which may not have a significant impact on concrete structure strength and durability. Non-destructive testing is a way of inspection the power and durability of the concrete framework using current concrete buildings. In the non-determinative test method, we can assess the power of the concrete without feeding the sample into collapse (i.e. without destructing the concrete). This technique is now an integral component of the quality control process. This inspection technique also enables us to study fracture size, small defects, and structural decay. Non-destructive plastic screening is a very straightforward technique but needs qualified and seasoned individuals with unique expertise to understand and evaluate sample outcomes. In NDT concrete constructions, the following techniques are frequently used. These techniques are typically used in briefing apps: • Visual inspection of concrete structure: Before any planned non-destructive experiment, visual inspection is performed of the concrete framework. [https://www.ft.com/search?q=Visual%20checks Visual checks] provide details of the specific harm, feasible triggers and NDT form for further study. Experienced civil engineers can understand data on damage to the concrete composition in visual inspections. • Schmidt NDT Test or Rebound Hammer Test: For assessment of ground hardness of concrete constructions, the Schmidt NDT test or Rebound Hammer trial is performed. Concrete ground hardness is an indicator of tangible strength. • Carbonation depth measurement test: this NDT is used to determine humidity absorption into the cement. This helps to identify the humidity that can trigger corrosion and strengthening. • Permeability test: The durability test of the concrete framework is to assess the water stream through the concrete. • Penetration resistance or Windsor probe test: Penetration resistance or experiment of Windsor's ground hardness and therefore surface stability and close plastic ground sections. • Half-cell electrical potential method: This NDT experiment is used to identify the corrosion ability of concrete reinforcing bars. • Covermeter testing: This technique serves to assess the structural cover of support boards and the fracture diameter of the current part. • Radiographic tests to locate cement vacuum and stress duct location. • For the determination of the compressive resistance of cement, ultrasound signal speed measurement is used. • Sonic techniques that provide kinetic and transmissive echoes using the instrumented hammer. • Modelling of tomography using information from ultrasonic experiments for detection of concrete voids in two or more ways. • Impact resonance tests are used to identify place and magnitude of failures in simple, strengthened and post-voltage concrete structural components such as holes, voids, delamination, honeycombing and deboning. • Radar or pulse radar test for the ground-penetrating a place of reinforcing walls or stress canals. This technique is used to inspect post-voltage wires, steel ducts and strengthening bar location rather than radiographic testing. • Infrared thermal imaging-This technique is used to identify specific flaws like voids, holes, delamination and other plastic abnormalities. This technique is also used for detecting spots of water in structures. Non-destructive testing is a generic word that enables to examine products, without modifying or damaging their usefulness, so as for the examination of products and parts. Surface and subsurface faults and faults may be found, sized, and located by NDT or NDE. NDT is essential in daily existence to ensure safety and efficiency. NDT is essential. Airplanes, spacecraft (shuttles), motors vehicle, pipelines, bridges, trains, plants, refineries, constructions, and petroleum platforms, all of which are inspected using NDT, provide typical examples. NDT is a leadership instrument for quality assurance that can deliver amazing outcomes if used properly. The different techniques, their capacities and constraints, knowledge of the norms applicable and the requirements for the conduct of the trials are required. Material, products, and equipment that can not satisfy their construction needs or expected lives owing to failures that have not been detected may involve costly maintenance or premature substitution. Such failures can also be the source of hazardous or disastrous circumstances and reduction of income caused by the plant's unforeseen shutdown. For each phase of the building of an item, no damaging screening may be implemented. NDT can be used to inspect the equipment and welds and can be approved, discarded or restored. In the course of the design life, NDT techniques can then be used to monitor the integrity of the item or structure. NDT is used typically for the following reasons: Accident prevention and cost reductions. Improvement of consumer quality. Determination of approval of a specific specification. Give data about replacement requirements. NDT is typically used for previous purposes. To obtain valid information and results, the following are necessary to: o Visual Inspection or Liquid Penetrant Inspection or Acoustic Emittance or Magnetic Particulate Inspection or Eddy Current Inspection, or Ultrasonic Inspection. Why is it essential to test non-destructive concrete? To determine the suitability of a framework for the planned use, testing of reinforced cement in place is often required. Non-destructive test techniques are used by evaluating resistance and other characteristics as corrosion of the strengthening, permeability, splitting, and vacuum composition to assess concrete properties. The assessment of both fresh and old constructions is essential for this sort of test. The main apps for fresh constructions are used primarily to measure material performance. [https://www.tumblr.com/search/Existing%20buildings Existing buildings] are generally tested with a concrete integrity evaluation. Non-destructive testing can also be used as an initial step to subsequent coring and more invasive measures such as: 1) Prefix, cast-in-place or in-situ construction, can also be used for non-destroying tests. (2) Determining acceptance of provided content and components. (3) Location and categorization of holes, voids, honeycombing or other flaws in structural construction. (4) Determination of the consistent structural structure. Non-destructive tests are carried out to identify and determine substance circumstances and defects that could trigger airplane crash, boilers collapse or railways to derail if left ignored. Non-destructive screening as a preventative intervention protects life in a multitude of sectors that have unstable or high-pressure materials and machinery. The item screened and the tester is also secure. There are distinct safety standards in separate sectors and various kinds of equipment must be checked frequently at various times. Regardless of what requires inspections, the most inexpensive choice is a non-destructive exam. Destructive test techniques, such as car accident trials, usually price more in advance of size. In the event of malfunctions, non-destructive studies can also contribute to ideas that contribute to the substitution or maintenance of machinery. Non-destructive tests are reliable because of the multitude of accessible and additional alternatives when it gets to precise outcomes. Any particular item of equipment or machinery may take several non-destructive trials that eliminate the danger of inspection or inaccuracy. Concrete buildings often have to be tested after the concrete has cooled to determine if the design is appropriate to its intended application. Such inspection should ideally be carried out without destroying the concrete. The trials of horns accessible vary from totally non-destructive exams, where concrete is not harmed, to mildly harmed areas, to partly damaging exams, like key exams and pull-outs and pull-out experiments, in which the floor has to be remediated after inspection. The variety of characteristics to be evaluated with non-destructive exams and partly damaging exams is quite wide and contains fundamental parameters such as density, flexibility, and [https://wijayaabadibesi.com/ jual besi plat semarang] resistance as well as skin hardness and air absorption, as well as strengthening the position, volume, and area. In some cases, the ability to detect voids, cracks, and delamination can also check the quality of workflow and structural integrity. Non-destructive testing for old and new constructions can be carried out. For fresh constructions, quality control or the settlement of disputes concerning performance of equipment or design is probable to be the main apps. The evaluation of current buildings is typically linked to a systemic quality or adequacy evaluation. In either case, for example, by removing the compression test cores alone, destructive testing can only allow the cost of the coring and tests to be carried out on a large and misleading structure in comparatively small numbers. The preliminary to subsequent coring of non-destructive trials can be used in those situations. Want to get your building concrete material tested, then Sigma Test and Research Centre is the best place to go for Non Destructive Testing in India. They have highly professional testers as well use up-to-date equipments for the same. Visit us or contact us at +91 - 95 60 222 333.

Sears And Delta Customers May Have Had Payment Data Exposed

2026-04-06T01:33:37Z

TameraMarcantel: "-text c-gray-1" >It's been a tough week for exposing customer data, from the personal info of 150 million Under Armour users to financial data for 5 million Saks, Lord & Taylor customers. Even Panera left personal information for millions of users unprotected on its site. Add another couple companies to the list: Today, both Sears Holding Corp and Delta Air Lines admitted that some of their customer payment information may have been exposed. But only bec..." içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu

-text c-gray-1" >It's been a tough week for exposing customer data, from the personal info of 150 million Under Armour users to financial data for 5 million Saks, Lord & Taylor customers. Even Panera left personal information for millions of users unprotected on its site. Add another couple companies to the list: Today, both Sears Holding Corp and Delta Air Lines admitted that some of their customer payment information may have been exposed. But only because the software service provider that was hosting both corporations' user data suffered a breach themselves. The tech firm [24]7.ai, which handles customer data for the aforementioned corporations and Kmart, publicly confirmed the breach yesterday. The incident happened on or following September 27th, 2017 and was resolved by October 12th, but Sears was only informed of the breach in mid-March. The company learned that credit card information for under 100,000 of its customers was exposed. In a statement, Delta assured that while a 'small subset' of its customers' information may have been available to the hackers, their passport, government ID and security data wasn't compromised. It's unclear whether that includes payment information, or if any data was accessed -- just that it was available to the intruders once [24]7.ai's systems were breached. Source: Reuters Coverage: Bloomberg In this article: breach, data, delta, hack, sears, security All products recommended by Engadget are selected by our editorial team, independent of our parent company. Some of our stories include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, we may earn an affiliate commission. Comments 166 Shares Share Tweet Share Save Popular on Engadget Nest Hello's holiday and winter ringtones are live View 'Call of Duty: Modern Warfare' prepares for its first battle pass View Netflix won't back a new season of 'Mystery Science Theater 3000' View Sony's best noise-cancelling headphones are on sale at Amazon View Twitter will start deleting inactive accounts in December (updated) View From around the web jual besi unp semarang

Kullanıcı:TameraMarcantel

2026-04-06T01:33:35Z

TameraMarcantel: "I'm Jamika and I live with my husband and our 3 children in Gdynia, in the NA south area. My hobbies are Cricket, Crocheting and Squash." içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu

I'm Jamika and I live with my husband and our 3 children in Gdynia, in the NA south area. My hobbies are Cricket, Crocheting and Squash.